Little Leading
Creek Sediment Study
A project
co-funded by the Ohio Department of Natural Resources
and
Co-PI with G. Riefler and B. Stuart
Introduction
Little Leading Creek, a tributary to Leading Creek, drains a twenty-four
square mile watershed located primarily in Scipio and
The Leading Creek Improvement Plan
(LCIP), completed in 1999 by Don Cherry et. al., indicates that the most negative environmental impacts in
Little Leading Creek are due to past mining and poor agricultural practices,
which would include high sediment depth in the channel, intermittent sediment
toxicity, and high concentrations of metals.
The LCIP ranks Little Leading Creek as the top priority in restoration
of the main Leading Creek tributaries.
Sedimentation is likely the strongest variable that prevents the stream
from attaining Warm Water Habitat level.
The accumulation of sand in Little Leading Creek appears to have
had a significant impact on the aquatic life in the creek, particularly
fish. Excess sediment in the water
column damages delicate gill tissue reducing the amount of oxygen intake into
the body and reduces the fish's ability to see and catch food. Settled sediment fills the spaces between
gravel and cobbles particles. This may
destroy the habitat of bottom dwelling organisms which fish rely on for food,
smother spawning gravels which kills eggs and fry in the gravel, and reduce
sheltered areas which young fish need to survive. Bed substrate over most of Little Leading
Creek is entirely composed of sand providing very poor habitat for macroinvertebrates and fish.
It is unclear where the sands that are constricting the lower
portions of Little Leading Creek are originating from. Eroding land in the headwaters impacted from
past surface mining may be a continuing source of sand to the creek. However, because mining operations have
ceased and several reclamation projects have been completed, sediment sources
from the abandoned mine lands (AML) may no longer exist. Rather, sediment in the channel and
floodplain accumulated during the active surface mining that occurred in the
1950s may not yet be flushed from the watershed. Accumulation of sediments in the channel may
have caused movement of the channel location, spreading sediment widely across
the floodplain, raising the ground elevation and reducing the creek
gradient. Even though the sediment
sources may be eliminated, there are likely erosion and deposition zones within
the creek, as the accumulated sediment continues to be redistributed throughout
the creek. Further, cattle grazing
directly along the creek banks may be adding significant quantities of
sediments to the creek. All of these
hypotheses will be tested in this study to determine where sediment is
currently accumulated, where current erosion and deposition zones exist, what
watershed sediment sources exist, and what the original source of accumulated
sediment was. These results will be
incorporated to understand sediment transport in Little Leading Creek, to
predict future sediment movement, to determine sediment impact on flooding and
fish habitat degradation, and to propose corrective actions.
One difficultly in understanding the movement of river sediment is
the transient, random nature of sediment transport. It is estimated that 70% of sediment
transport in rivers occurs during storm events (Yang, 1996), yet sampling
during storm events is problematic. Each
storm event has different characteristics that affect transport, so
generalizations are difficult to make.
Further, significant storms are difficult to predict, can be of short
enough duration to limit the extent of sampling over an entire watershed, and
sediment transport may vary significantly both in total load and particle
distribution from the initial first flush of the storm to the time to
concentration in the watershed. In this
study, samples will be collected both during normal stream flow and several
storm events to characterize the sediment sources and transport trends under a
variety of flow conditions.